Client stories

The decisions behind the numbers

Client accounts of revenue reconciliation, lifetime value review and cohort analysis work.

The decisions behind the numbers

A payback target rebuilt around net revenue

A UK wellbeing app had set one acquisition ceiling using six-month revenue averaged across all payers. The number mixed annual and monthly plans, deducted refunds inconsistently and gave recent paid-social cohorts the benefit of mature organic retention.

We reconciled store proceeds to the finance ledger, separated plan terms and compared channels at equal cohort ages. The team replaced its single ceiling with channel and plan-specific guardrails and added a maturity label to weekly reporting.

“The first useful moment was not a new chart. It was agreeing which number counted as revenue. Once that was fixed, the channel comparison finally held together.” — Growth lead

Renewal decay that was really a product mix change

A learning subscription saw month-three revenue deteriorate and assumed retention had fallen. Cohort cuts showed that the apparent decline followed a shift toward a lower-priced product with different school-calendar seasonality. Like-for-like renewal was steadier than the blended line suggested.

The analysis did not justify reversing the product mix. It gave the finance team a better forecast structure and prevented a retention project from being launched against the wrong diagnosis.

“We had hoped for a quicker answer, and the identity matching added a week. The delay was justified: the final comparison used the same payer population on both sides.” — Finance director

A model challenged before budget sign-off

For a productivity app, the existing LTV model projected a stable renewal rate from only two mature cohorts. Sensitivity tests showed that a modest change in late renewal moved the acquisition case from positive to negative. The board approved a smaller test budget with a pre-agreed review date.

“Monitorvectorgrid made the uncertainty legible. We could still choose to spend, but nobody could mistake the central case for an observed fact.” — Co-founder

Bring us the decision your current reporting cannot settle.